This doc ships into a public repo (PR 1's own remit). Strip process
notes that read as an internal artifact rather than architecture:
the Decisions-table row naming who implements/reviews each PR, the
two "needs a funded testnet wallet from Filip" notes (also invites
"so it's untested?" from outside readers), and the instruction to
hold a line on PR #2, which already merged. Renumbered the Open
items list after dropping the wallet entry. The named-reviewer phrase
in section 10 falls in the same category and is genericized for the
same reason, though it wasn't separately called out.
Section 13 (residual risks) and the §12 typecheck findings are
untouched — those are load-bearing technical content, not planning
chatter.
854c5b0005