Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Logan Johnson
cd8a968179 fix(relay): push system channel events to a lease that names them (#8517)
🤖
## Summary
Mobile clients can now get push notifications for a system channel, but
only when they ask for that channel by its ID. Before this change, the
relay never sent push for system channels, even when a client asked for
one directly.

System channels are channels the app uses for its own purposes (for
example, agent attention). They are hidden from clients that do not know
about them. #8507 made push use the same visibility rule as normal
reads: a push subscription sees a system channel, or any channel type
added later, only if its filter names that channel ID in `#h`. With that
rule, an older client can never get system channel pushes by accident.
The extra "never push system channels" rule in NIP-CL now only blocks
clients that ask on purpose, such as a future Live Activities
subscription. This PR removes that special case.

### Details
- `push_runtime.rs`: system channels now follow the same rule as other
named-only channel types. The relay still checks membership before it
sends a wake.
- `NamedOnlyChannels::is_system` had no other caller, so it is removed.
- NIP-CL and NOSTR.md now describe the shared rule instead of the ban.
- No behavior change for current clients. They do not name system
channels in their push subscriptions.

### Related issue
Follow-up to #8507 (see
https://github.com/block/buzz/pull/8507#issuecomment-6316180106).

### Testing
- `named_only_channel_pushes_only_to_a_filter_that_names_it` now expects
a wake for a system channel named by `#h`. It also checks that a broad
filter still gets no wake, and that a non-member still gets no wake.
- `cargo test -p buzz-relay --lib push_runtime`, `cargo clippy -p
buzz-relay --all-targets -D warnings`, and `cargo fmt --check` pass.

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-21 10:38:57 -04:00
Logan Johnson
25bcb791b4 fix(relay): show only legacy channel types to reads that name no channel (#8469)
🤖
## Summary
Every Buzz channel has a **type**, such as an ordinary chat channel
(`stream`), a forum, a DM or a workflow. A client app can only show the
types it was built to understand. This PR makes the relay (the Buzz
server) follow one rule everywhere: **a client sees a channel only if it
knows that channel's type.** #8406 applied this rule to membership
notices. This PR applies it to the reads that list channels without
naming one: the channel list, "channels I belong to", the sidebar's
unread list and artifact lists.

Before, these reads left out one type by name: system channels. Now they
return only the four types that every client has always known: `stream`,
`forum`, `dm` and `workflow`. Today the result is the same for every
user, because `system` is the only other type.

### Backward compatibility: old clients stay safe
- A client that was released before a new channel type exists will never
receive channels of that type in its lists. It cannot show such a
channel correctly, so it does not get one.
- Requests that old clients send today return exactly what they returned
before. Nothing changes for them now or when a type is added later.

### Forward compatibility: new types can be added safely
- Before, the rule was a deny list: "everything except `system`". Each
new type would appear in every deployed client by default, unless
someone remembered to update five separate checks in the relay. A missed
check would show the new type to clients that cannot handle it.
- Now the rule is an allow list that is frozen: the four original types.
A new type is hidden by default, with no relay change needed. Clients
that understand it can request it on purpose, the same way current
clients request system channels today. Each new type gets its own
opt-in, so adding a type cannot break clients that are already in use.

## Details
- One frozen list, `buzz_core::channel::LEGACY_CHANNEL_TYPES`.
Membership notices (#8406) now use the same constant, so channel reads
and notices cannot drift apart. The duplicate
`LEGACY_NOTICE_CHANNEL_TYPES` is removed.
- One SQL helper, `legacy_channel_type_sql`, builds `channel_type IN
('stream', 'forum', 'dm', 'workflow')` from that list. It replaces the
five `<> 'system'` checks:
- `get_accessible_channel_ids` (both halves): the implicit channel scope
of any filter without `#h`, for example kind 39000 channel metadata,
REQ, COUNT and search;
  - `get_accessible_channels`: the channel list;
  - the personal-read sidebar roster;
  - artifact queries.
- A filter that names a channel (`#h`, or `#d` on kinds 39000–39003)
reads it under the ordinary rules, whatever its type: the reader is a
member, or the channel is open. The uncached named-channel lookup,
`get_readable_named_only_channels`, now returns every readable
non-legacy channel with its type, not only system channels. Before, a
non-member could not read an open later-type channel, and `#d` read
nothing. Workflow run reads and thread windows use the same lookup.
- The relay keeps each named channel in the scope of the filter that
names it only. This also holds when it re-checks membership for a named
channel that the cache lacks.
- The opt-in to system channels (`#t:["system"]` or `#P` on kinds
39000–39003) adds readable **system** channels only. It never adds a
channel of another type, even one that a sibling filter in the same
request names. The relay scope type `NamedOnlyChannels` keeps the type
with each channel, so the opt-in can tell them apart.
- NIP-CL and NOSTR.md state the rule.

### Related issue
Follows #8406 (the same rule for membership notices).

### Testing
New Postgres tests use a scratch database with a `future_type` value
added to `channel_type`, as a later migration would add one:
- `reads_that_name_no_channel_leave_out_a_type_added_later`: the channel
scope, the channel list and the sidebar roster leave out the later type
and keep the legacy types.
- `artifacts_of_a_later_channel_type_are_read_only_by_name`: artifact
current and history queries and counts without `#h` leave out the later
type. With `#h` naming the channel, they return it.
- `channels_of_a_later_type_are_read_only_by_name`: production read
paths (WS REQ, WS COUNT, HTTP `/query` and `/count`). A member reads a
private later-type channel and anyone reads an open one, by `#h` and by
`#d`; an outsider cannot read the private one; a read that names no
channel returns neither. In one request, a filter that names the channel
plus a `#P` or `#t:["system", <label>]` sibling: the sibling does not
get it.
- `a_named_channel_of_a_later_type_stays_in_its_named_filter`: the
membership re-check for a channel joined mid-request, with an unnamed
sibling and a `#P` sibling. Only the naming filter gets the channel.

Each test fails when its predicate goes back to `<> 'system'`, when the
named lookup loads only `system`, or when the opt-in adds every
named-only channel. The #8406 notice tests and the system channel
Postgres tests pass on this branch.

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-20 11:04:29 -04:00
Logan Johnson
cc6336d985 feat(relay): tag every membership notice with its channel type (#8406)
🤖
## Summary
- When someone is added to or removed from a system channel, the relay
now sends them the usual "you were added / removed" notice. Before, it
sent nothing, so a client could learn about a new system channel only by
rereading every channel.
- **A client sees a notice only if it knows the channel's type.** Every
membership notice now carries its channel type. Clients that do not send
`#t` (every client today) see only the types that existed before system
channels, so they see no change. A type that Buzz adds later is hidden
from them by default.
- The notices are stored like every other membership notice, so a client
that was offline can catch up with `since` instead of rereading all its
channels.

## Details
- Every kind:44100 (added) and kind:44101 (removed) notice now carries
`["t", <channel_type>]`, for example `["t","stream"]` or
`["t","system"]`.
- **One place reads the channel type:** `emit_membership_notification`
in `side_effects.rs`, where the relay signs the notice. A channel's type
is set when it is created and no code path changes it, so the tag stays
correct. If the channel row is missing, the relay sends no notice rather
than an untagged one.
- **The rule (NIP-CL):**
- a filter with `#t` matches a notice only when the notice's type is one
of its `#t` values;
- a filter without `#t` matches only the **legacy types**: `stream`,
`forum`, `dm`, `workflow`. This list is frozen
(`LEGACY_NOTICE_CHANNEL_TYPES`), so a new type never joins it;
- a notice without a `t` tag was stored before this change. It is always
a legacy type, so the relay treats it as one, and replay across the
upgrade stays complete.
- **Fails closed.** The rule lives in two shared places, and both
default to the legacy types. A read path that is not updated behaves as
it does today:
- `filters_match` / `notice_visible` (buzz-core). Live fan-out, the REQ
history post-filter, COUNT, the HTTP bridge and push all match through
it.
- `EventQuery::notice_channel_types` (buzz-db). Its SQL keeps only
visible notices before `LIMIT`, so page limits and COUNT stay exact.
`None` means legacy types. Only `filter_to_query_params` sets it, from
the filter's `#t`.
- A client that knows every current type sends one filter:
`{"kinds":[44100,44101],"#p":[<me>],"#t":["stream","forum","dm","workflow","system"]}`.
NIP-CL and NOSTR.md describe this.
- **Only the target receives a notice.** A notice names the target, the
channel and who made the change, and the relay signs it, so knowing its
id is not permission to read it. 44100/44101 are now in
`RESULT_GATED_KINDS`, the one list used by the `ids` exemption check,
the per-result reader check (WS and HTTP history, push), live fan-out
(same pod and Redis) and COUNT. This also closes the same id lookup for
ordinary channels' notices.
- No migration: 44100/44101 are already excluded from search indexing.

## Testing
- `buzz-core`: a table test covers untagged, `stream`, `system` and a
future type against filters without `#t`, with `#t` for one type, and
with `#t` for every type. Other kinds keep the plain `#t` match.
- Postgres tests (`system_channel_postgres_tests.rs`): live fan-out, REQ
history, COUNT and the HTTP bridge, for a filter without `#t`, a
`#t:["system"]` filter and an all-types filter; an untagged legacy
notice; a non-target with an `ids` filter on each path; and a raw
`EventQuery` that does not set the field.
- I broke each part on purpose and the tests failed: no type tag on the
notice, no rule in `filters_match`, no SQL rule, and no untagged clause
in the SQL.
- End to end: I built a relay container from f24f8e7ba and ran
buzz-app's `container-relay.e2e.test.ts` (block/buzz-app#1290) against
it. The live system channel test passed 5 of 5 runs.

Paired client change: block/buzz-app#1290. It works unchanged against
this relay.

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-19 16:29:32 -04:00
Logan Johnson
d28f6b2f70 feat(relay): let channel-state filters opt in to system channels (#8182)
🤖
## Summary
After part 2, a client can read a system channel only if it already
knows the ID. This PR lets a client find system channels on purpose,
with an ordinary Nostr filter and no new filter key.

A filter on the channel-state kinds (39000–39003) now also returns the
system channels the reader can read when it has either:

- `#t:["system"]`, the channel type tag that every channel-state event
already carries; or
- any `#P`, the creator tag from #8174. Asking for the channels of a
named creator returns a small result, so it does not fill generic
channel lists.

The filter then matches as usual. Existing clients send neither on these
kinds, so they still never see a system channel.

| Reader wants | Filter |
|---|---|
| My system channels | `{kinds:[39002], #p:[me], #t:["system"]}`, then
their kind:39000 by `#d` |
| Open system channels | `{kinds:[39000], #t:["system"]}` |
| One creator's labeled channel, system or not | `{kinds:[39000],
#P:[creator], #t:[label]}` |

Private system channels stay hidden from non-members, as for any private
channel. Values in one tag filter combine with OR, so `#t:["system",
label]` means `system` **or** the label; use `#P` plus the label
instead.

Part 3 of 3, stacked on part 2.

### Related issue
None found.

### Details
- The opt-in is decided per filter in `handlers/system_channels.rs` and
applies on REQ, COUNT and the HTTP bridge. It applies only when every
kind in the filter is 39000–39003.
- A label alone is not an opt-in.
- `NOSTR.md` documents the system channel query rules.
- **Spec.** NIP-CL says how a filter asks for system channels.
- The relay information document (NIP-11) now lists `"nip-cl"` in
`supported_extensions`. Clients use this to tell if a relay supports
labels and system channels, and refuse those calls on a relay that does
not. NIP-CL documents this.

### Testing
- End-to-end relay test: `#t:["system"]` finds both system channels for
a member and only the open one for a non-member; 39002 `#p:[me]` with
`#t:["system"]` lists the member's system channels; `#P` includes a
creator's system channels; creator plus label returns exactly one
channel with `limit: 1` and excludes another creator's channel with the
same label; a label alone does not return the system channel; COUNT and
HTTP `/query` and `/count` agree.
- The test fails when the opt-in is disabled.
- Unit tests for which filters opt in.

### Stack
These are two stacks. Merge them in this order. Client support
(creating, labeling and finding these channels) will be in
block/buzz-app, not the buzz SDK and CLI.

**Stack 1: channel labels and creator lookup (#8174–#8176)**

1. #8174 channel type and creator tags, and the channel creation time
2. #8175 channel labels
3. #8176 database-side label and creator match, and the rule for
choosing one channel

**Stack 2: system channels (#8180–#8182)**, stacked on stack 1 because
it uses labels and the creator tag

4. #8180 the system channel type
5. #8181 leave system channels out of reads that do not name them
6. #8182 channel-state filters opt in to system channels ← this PR

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-15 08:40:16 -04:00
Logan Johnson
cdf03f618a feat(relay): leave system channels out of reads that do not name them (#8181)
🤖
## Summary
After part 1, a system channel is still returned by every query that
returns ordinary channels, so existing clients would show it as a chat.
This PR makes the relay leave system channels out of every read that
does not name them. Clients do not need to filter, so clients that know
nothing about system channels stay correct.

| Query | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| A query that does not name a channel (no `#h`), COUNT, full-text
search, the HTTP `/query` and `/count` routes, artifact queries
(`{"artifact": ...}`), the sidebar | Includes system channels | Leaves
them out |
| "Channels I belong to" (kind:39002 `#p:[me]`) | Includes them | Leaves
them out |
| A filter that names the channel with `#h`, or with `#d` on kinds
39000–39003 | Ordinary read rules | Unchanged: members can read it, and
anyone can read it if it is open |

Push notifications and "you were added to a channel" notifications
(kinds 44100/44101) skip system channels, because a client that received
one would show the channel.

A client that is given a system channel's ID, for example in a pasted
link, can still open it. Naming the ID is the opt-in. This keeps system
channels ordinary NIP-29 groups.

Part 2 of 3, stacked on part 1.

### Related issue
None found.

### Details
- The rule lives in one place: `get_accessible_channel_ids`, the set of
channels a query may read when it does not name one. It is the union of
the reader's memberships and every open channel; both halves now exclude
`channel_type = 'system'`. Because the filter is in SQL before `LIMIT`,
pages stay full.
- A filter that names a system channel adds it to that filter's scope
only (`handlers/system_channels.rs`). A sibling filter in the same
request keeps the implicit set, so naming one system channel cannot
widen another filter.
- Thread windows and the workflows API name their channel, so they
follow the same named-channel rule.
- Artifact queries have their own read check in SQL. It reads a system
channel only when the query's `#h` names it.
- When a request re-checks membership for a named channel that its first
lookup missed, a confirmed system channel joins only the filters that
name it. Before, a reader who joined a system channel during the request
could have it added to a sibling filter's scope.
- The system-channel lookup runs only when a filter names a channel
outside the implicit set, so ordinary queries do not pay for it.
- **Spec.** NIP-CL lists the reads that leave system channels out, and
says when a filter names one. `AGENTS.md` notes this for `get_channels`.

### Testing
- End-to-end relay test (Postgres and Redis) with a private system
channel, an open system channel and an ordinary channel, as a member and
as a non-member: REQ without `#h`, NIP-50 search, COUNT, HTTP `/query`,
HTTP search, HTTP `/count`, the channel list, and 39002 `#p:[me]` return
only the ordinary channel. Named reads by `#h` and `#d` follow
member-or-open on REQ, COUNT, search and HTTP.
- Relay test: adding a member to a system channel sends no kind:44100;
an ordinary channel still does.
- Both tests fail when the SQL exclusion or the named-channel scope is
removed.
- Database test: an artifact in an open system channel is missing from
`{"artifact":"current"}` and present with `#h:[<system channel>]`, for a
member and a non-member. It fails without the channel-type condition.
- Relay test: the membership re-check confirms a system channel that the
system-channel lookup missed. The channel goes to the filter that names
it, and a sibling filter's scope does not include it. It fails without
the fix.
- Unit tests for the per-filter scope. They now run in `just test-unit`
and `scripts/run-tests.sh`.

### Stack
These are two stacks. Merge them in this order. Client support
(creating, labeling and finding these channels) will be in
block/buzz-app, not the buzz SDK and CLI.

**Stack 1: channel labels and creator lookup (#8174–#8176)**

1. #8174 channel type and creator tags, and the channel creation time
2. #8175 channel labels
3. #8176 database-side label and creator match, and the rule for
choosing one channel

**Stack 2: system channels (#8180–#8182)**, stacked on stack 1 because
it uses labels and the creator tag

4. #8180 the system channel type
5. #8181 leave system channels out of reads that do not name them ← this
PR
6. #8182 channel-state filters opt in to system channels

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-15 08:40:15 -04:00
Logan Johnson
71d7aa0436 feat(relay): add the system channel type (#8180)
🤖
## Summary
Buzz uses channel membership to decide who can read what, and every
channel a person belongs to shows up in their client as a chat. So there
is no way to make a group that exists only for access control, for
example "only this agent and its owner can read the agent's config".
Such a channel would appear in both people's sidebars, search results
and unread counts.

This stack adds a **system channel**: an ordinary channel that queries
leave out unless they ask for it. This first PR adds the type itself.

- `kind:9007` (create channel) with `["channel_type", "system"]` creates
a system channel.
- It is private unless the creator sends `["visibility", "open"]`.
- While it is private, its channel metadata event (kind:39000) carries
the NIP-29 `hidden` marker, which means "hide this group's metadata from
non-members". Until now the relay set `hidden` only for DMs.

On its own this PR does not yet hide system channels from queries. Part
2 does that.

Part 1 of 3, stacked on #8176 (the channel labels and creator lookup
stack, which this feature uses).

### Related issue
None found.

### Details
- Migration 0062 adds `system` to the `channel_type` Postgres enum. No
new columns.
- `buzz_core::channel::ChannelType::System`, and `system` is now a
reserved label name (labels cannot equal a channel type name).
- `buzz-admin` reconcile writes `hidden` with the same rule as the
relay. Usage metrics count system channels.
- **Rollback.** A relay older than this change cannot read `channel_type
= 'system'`. Do not roll back past it while system channels exist.
- **Spec.** NIP-CL gets a "System channels" section. `ARCHITECTURE.md`
lists the `System` type.

### Testing
- Relay test: a system channel is private and `hidden` by default;
opening it removes `hidden`; its first `t` tag is `system`.
- Migration embed and usage-metrics tests.

### Stack
These are two stacks. Merge them in this order. Client support
(creating, labeling and finding these channels) will be in
block/buzz-app, not the buzz SDK and CLI.

**Stack 1: channel labels and creator lookup (#8174–#8176)**

1. #8174 channel type and creator tags, and the channel creation time
2. #8175 channel labels
3. #8176 database-side label and creator match, and the rule for
choosing one channel

**Stack 2: system channels (#8180–#8182)**, stacked on stack 1 because
it uses labels and the creator tag

4. #8180 the system channel type ← this PR
5. #8181 leave system channels out of reads that do not name them
6. #8182 channel-state filters opt in to system channels

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-14 19:03:34 -04:00
Logan Johnson
a3909acc67 feat(relay): match label and creator filters before the page limit (#8176)
🤖
## Summary
After parts 1 and 2, a client can ask for "channels with label X" or
"channels created by key K". But the relay applied these tag filters
after it read one page of the newest channel events. So a request such
as `{kinds:[39000], #t:["workspace"], limit:10}` could return fewer than
10 channels, or none, while matching channels existed. This PR moves the
label and creator match into the database query, before the page limit.

Part 3 of 3, stacked on part 2.

### Related issue
None found.

### Details
- Applies only when every kind in the filter is a relay-signed
channel-state kind (39000–39003). Other kinds keep today's behavior.
- The database match uses JSONB containment on `tags`, which is
GIN-indexed. Containment can match a little too much (for example, a tag
that contains both strings in another position), never too little. So
the relay still checks each returned event with the normal Nostr filter
rules, and `COUNT` requests keep that check too.
- The same match is applied to the query path and the count path.
- **Spec.** NIP-CL now says that `#t` and `#P` match before `limit`.
- **Choosing one channel.** The relay does not make labels unique, so
two creates for one label can both succeed, for example when two
processes of one agent start at the same time. NIP-CL gets a "Choosing
one channel" section: a client that needs one channel per creator and
label looks it up with `#P` + `#t`, creates it only if none exists, and
otherwise uses the oldest one (the lowest `created_at` tag, then the
lowest channel ID). Every reader that follows this rule picks the same
channel, even after an edit.

### Testing
- Relay test: many channels, one match, small `limit`. The request
returns the match for both `#t` and `#P`. This test fails without the
change.
- Unit test: `#t` and `#P` reach the database query only for
channel-state kinds.
- Relay test: one creator sends two creates for the same label at once.
Both channels exist, a `#P` + `#t` lookup finds both, and the
oldest-channel rule picks the same one in either order, even after the
older channel's metadata is re-published by an edit.

### Stack
These are two stacks. Merge them in this order. Client support
(creating, labeling and finding these channels) will be in
block/buzz-app, not the buzz SDK and CLI.

**Stack 1: channel labels and creator lookup (#8174–#8176)**

1. #8174 channel type and creator tags, and the channel creation time
2. #8175 channel labels
3. #8176 database-side label and creator match, and the rule for
choosing one channel ← this PR

**Stack 2: system channels (#8180–#8182)**, stacked on stack 1 because
it uses labels and the creator tag

4. #8180 the system channel type
5. #8181 leave system channels out of reads that do not name them
6. #8182 channel-state filters opt in to system channels

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-14 19:03:34 -04:00
Logan Johnson
2f79374f48 feat(relay): channel labels (#8175)
🤖
## Summary
A plugin or agent often needs to tag its own channels and then find them
again, for example "my attention-config channel" or "all channels of
this workspace". Today a channel has no labels: the relay ignores any
`t` tags in create or edit requests. This PR adds channel labels.

- A create request can carry up to 8 labels as `["t", "<label>"]` tags.
- An edit request with `t` tags replaces the label set. `["t", ""]`
alone clears it, the same convention as `["ttl", ""]`. Only owners and
admins can change labels, as for the name.
- The relay publishes each label as a `t` tag on the channel's state
events, after the channel type tag.

Part 2 of 3, stacked on part 1.

### Related issue
None found.

### Details
- **Rules.** A label uses 1–64 characters from `a-z`, `0-9`, `.`, `:`
and `-`. The relay refuses a label equal to a channel type name
(`stream`, `forum`, `dm`, `workflow`, `system`), so a label cannot make
a channel look like another type.
- **No trust from labels.** Any admin can set a label. Only the
relay-written creator tag (part 1) says who made a channel.
- **Storage.** New migration `0061_channel_labels.sql` adds
`channels.labels TEXT[] NOT NULL DEFAULT '{}'`. Channels without labels
look and behave as before.
- **Readers.** The CLI and `buzz-acp` read the channel type from the
first `t` tag. Before this PR they used the last one, which would now be
a label.
- **Spec.** NIP-CL gets a "Channel labels" section with these rules.

### Testing
- Relay tests: labels at creation appear after the type tag, edit
replaces and clears them, invalid labels are refused, and members who
are not admins cannot change them.
- Unit tests for the label rules: allowed characters, length, reserved
type names, the 8-label cap and the clear marker.
- `buzz-acp` test: the channel type comes from the first `t` tag, not a
label.

### Stack
These are two stacks. Merge them in this order. Client support
(creating, labeling and finding these channels) will be in
block/buzz-app, not the buzz SDK and CLI.

**Stack 1: channel labels and creator lookup (#8174–#8176)**

1. #8174 channel type and creator tags, and the channel creation time
2. #8175 channel labels ← this PR
3. #8176 database-side label and creator match, and the rule for
choosing one channel

**Stack 2: system channels (#8180–#8182)**, stacked on stack 1 because
it uses labels and the creator tag

4. #8180 the system channel type
5. #8181 leave system channels out of reads that do not name them
6. #8182 channel-state filters opt in to system channels

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-14 17:25:46 -04:00
Logan Johnson
8bb49a1b6a feat(relay): publish channel type and creator on every channel-state event (#8174)
🤖
## Summary
Clients cannot tell who created a channel, and only the channel-metadata
event says what type of channel it is. This PR makes every relay-signed
channel-state event carry both facts, so a client can find "the channel
that this key created" with one ordinary Nostr filter.

- Channel metadata, admin list and member list events (kinds 39000,
39001 and 39002) now all carry the channel type as their first `t` tag,
then the creator as a `P` tag.
- The creator comes from the relay's own record of who signed the
channel's create request. No client can set it, and it does not change
when ownership moves.
- Channel metadata (kind:39000) also carries `["created_at", <unix
seconds>]`, the time the channel was created. The event's own
`created_at` changes on every edit, so before this a client could not
tell which of two channels is older.

This is part 1 of a 3-part stack (channel labels and creator lookup).
The system channels stack (#8180–#8182) builds on it.

### Related issue
None found.

### Details
- **Why `P`.** Several Nostr specs (NIP-22, NIP-34, NIP-72) use
uppercase `P` for the author of the root object, and lowercase `p` for
people involved. Lowercase `p` is already used on these events for
members and DM participants, and a filter matches tag values, not their
meaning, so `#p` would mix them.
- **Trust.** A client that trusts a channel because of its creator must
also check that the relay key signed the event.
- **Order.** The type `t` tag comes first, so clients that read the
first `t` tag still get the type after part 2 adds labels as more `t`
tags.
- **Creation time.** The relay reads it from `channels.created_at`, so
an edit does not change it. #8176 uses it to pick one channel when two
creates race.
- `buzz-admin reconcile` writes the same tags when it rebuilds these
events. `NOSTR.md` documents the tags.
- **Spec.** New `docs/nips/NIP-CL.md` defines these tags, the trust rule
and lookup by creator. Later PRs in both stacks add their parts to it.
`NOSTR.md` links to it.

### Testing
- Relay tests in `group_state_postgres_tests.rs`: each of the three
kinds carries the type first, then the creator; the creator stays the
same after an ownership transfer; kind:39000 carries the stored creation
time, and still does after an edit.
- Unit test for the shared tag builder that both the relay and
`buzz-admin reconcile` use.

### Stack
These are two stacks. Merge them in this order. Client support
(creating, labeling and finding these channels) will be in
block/buzz-app, not the buzz SDK and CLI.

**Stack 1: channel labels and creator lookup (#8174–#8176)**

1. #8174 channel type and creator tags, and the channel creation time ←
this PR
2. #8175 channel labels
3. #8176 database-side label and creator match, and the rule for
choosing one channel

**Stack 2: system channels (#8180–#8182)**, stacked on stack 1 because
it uses labels and the creator tag

4. #8180 the system channel type
5. #8181 leave system channels out of reads that do not name them
6. #8182 channel-state filters opt in to system channels

---------

Signed-off-by: Logan Johnson <loganj@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry <627498bd4bd1f281a16431e3c6cce3b5c25b6692798c78672298aefbf2f8f8b5@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
2026-10-14 09:22:42 -04:00