mirror of
https://github.com/block/buzz.git
synced 2026-10-31 22:41:12 +00:00
20609f1815
Rebased onto origin/main (5bf78671f4).
Conflict resolved in crates/buzz-agent/src/config.rs: kept our generated
anthropic_thinking_config_generated as the sole authority; absorbed main's
thinking shapes, ThinkingSummary enum + parse_thinking_summary, and the
thinking_summary field in Config wired through from_env / for_discovery.
Fixed CI job (model-capabilities): actions/checkout comment v6 → v6.0.3,
Swatinem/rust-cache SHA bumped to tagged v2.9.1 (c1937114) to resolve
zizmor ref-version-mismatch finding (r3730151005).
62ebc9431 fix(model-capabilities): collapse empty segments in Rust gpt-version-segment matcher
817b88790 test(file-size): fix fileOverrides integration test under GITHUB_ACTIONS
1e9df5568 fix(manifest): enforce registry_label exclusion on family rules; test fileOverrides boundary
0e6aacfd2 fix(buzz-agent): curate display name in configured_model_fallback
77c24ef32 chore(manifest): remove dead registry_labels key
Co-authored-by: Will Pfleger <pfleger.will@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Pfleger <pfleger.will@gmail.com>
670 lines
25 KiB
JavaScript
670 lines
25 KiB
JavaScript
#!/usr/bin/env node
|
|
/**
|
|
* Schema-negative validator tests for the manifest generator.
|
|
*
|
|
* Every validator rule in generate-model-capabilities.mjs must have a
|
|
* failing-input test here — if validation is missing, these tests would
|
|
* not catch the defect.
|
|
*
|
|
* Uses Node.js built-in test runner (node --test).
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { test } from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import { readFileSync, writeFileSync, unlinkSync, mkdirSync, mkdtempSync } from "node:fs";
|
|
import { join, dirname } from "node:path";
|
|
import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
|
|
import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
|
|
import { execFileSync, spawnSync } from "node:child_process";
|
|
|
|
const __dirname = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
|
|
const repoRoot = join(__dirname, "..");
|
|
const manifestPath = join(repoRoot, "scripts", "model-capabilities.json");
|
|
const generatorPath = join(repoRoot, "scripts", "generate-model-capabilities.mjs");
|
|
|
|
/** Load the real manifest so we can mutate copies. */
|
|
const BASE_MANIFEST = JSON.parse(readFileSync(manifestPath, "utf8"));
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Run the generator with a mutated manifest, returning { exitCode, stderr, stdout }.
|
|
* Writes the mutated manifest to a temp file and overrides the manifest path via env.
|
|
*/
|
|
function runGeneratorWithManifest(manifestOverride) {
|
|
// Write mutated manifest to a temp path
|
|
const tmpDir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "test-validator-"));
|
|
const tmpManifest = join(tmpDir, "model-capabilities.json");
|
|
const tmpOutputDir = join(tmpDir, "out");
|
|
mkdirSync(tmpOutputDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
|
|
writeFileSync(tmpManifest, JSON.stringify(manifestOverride));
|
|
|
|
// Run the generator via node, pointing MANIFEST_PATH env at the temp file
|
|
// The generator reads from process.env.MANIFEST_PATH if set (we add this support)
|
|
const result = spawnSync(
|
|
process.execPath,
|
|
[generatorPath, "--manifest-path", tmpManifest, "--output-dir", tmpOutputDir],
|
|
{
|
|
encoding: "utf8",
|
|
env: { ...process.env },
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Cleanup
|
|
try { unlinkSync(tmpManifest); } catch {}
|
|
|
|
return { exitCode: result.status ?? 1, stderr: result.stderr, stdout: result.stdout };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Assert that the generator REJECTS the given manifest (exits non-zero).
|
|
* The optional `expectedMessage` is checked in stderr if provided.
|
|
*/
|
|
function assertRejects(label, manifest, expectedMessage) {
|
|
const { exitCode, stderr, stdout } = runGeneratorWithManifest(manifest);
|
|
assert.notEqual(exitCode, 0, `${label}: expected generator to fail but it succeeded.\nstdout: ${stdout}\nstderr: ${stderr}`);
|
|
if (expectedMessage) {
|
|
const combined = stderr + stdout;
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
combined.includes(expectedMessage),
|
|
`${label}: expected error message "${expectedMessage}" not found.\nstdout: ${stdout}\nstderr: ${stderr}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Deep clone the base manifest and apply a mutator function. */
|
|
function mutate(fn) {
|
|
const clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(BASE_MANIFEST));
|
|
fn(clone);
|
|
return clone;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid enum value in family_rule.thinking_mode
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid thinking_mode in family rule is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid thinking_mode",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].thinking_mode = "invalid-mode";
|
|
}),
|
|
"thinking_mode",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid enum value in family_rule.databricks_v2_wire_route
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid databricks_v2_wire_route in family rule is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid databricks_v2_wire_route",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].databricks_v2_wire_route = "chat-completions";
|
|
}),
|
|
"databricks_v2_wire_route",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid enum value in family_rule.supported_efforts[]
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid effort value in family rule supported_efforts is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid supported_efforts value",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].supported_efforts = ["low", "ultra-high"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"supported_efforts",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: empty supported_efforts array in family rule
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: empty supported_efforts in family rule is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"empty supported_efforts",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].supported_efforts = [];
|
|
}),
|
|
"supported_efforts",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: default_effort not in supported_efforts (non-null)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: default_effort not in supported_efforts is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"default_effort not in supported_efforts",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].supported_efforts = ["low", "medium"];
|
|
m.family_rules[0].default_effort = "high"; // not in list
|
|
}),
|
|
"default_effort",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid normalization_policy in family rule
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid normalization_policy in family rule is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid normalization_policy",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].normalization_policy = "pass-through-all";
|
|
}),
|
|
"normalization_policy",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid match_kind in family rule
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid match_kind in family rule is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid match_kind",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].match_kind = "regex";
|
|
}),
|
|
"match_kind",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: duplicate family rule id
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: duplicate family rule id is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"duplicate family rule id",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules.push({ ...m.family_rules[0] }); // duplicate id
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: registry_label on a family rule is rejected (display rule (a))
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: registry_label on a family rule is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family rule registry_label forbidden",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].registry_label = "Family Masquerade";
|
|
}),
|
|
"registry_label is not allowed on family rules",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: duplicate exact_record (provider, raw_model_id) key
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: duplicate exact_record key is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"duplicate exact_record key",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.exact_records.push({ ...m.exact_records[0] }); // duplicate
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record missing provider
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record missing provider is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record missing provider",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.exact_records.push({ raw_model_id: "some-model" });
|
|
}),
|
|
"provider",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record missing raw_model_id
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record missing raw_model_id is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record missing raw_model_id",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.exact_records.push({ provider: "databricks_v2" });
|
|
}),
|
|
"raw_model_id",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: provider fallback record missing blank state
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: provider fallback missing blank state is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"provider fallback missing blank",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
delete m.provider_fallbacks.anthropic.blank;
|
|
}),
|
|
"blank",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: provider fallback record missing concrete_unknown state
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: provider fallback missing concrete_unknown state is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"provider fallback missing concrete_unknown",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
delete m.provider_fallbacks.anthropic.concrete_unknown;
|
|
}),
|
|
"concrete_unknown",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid thinking_mode in provider fallback
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid thinking_mode in provider fallback is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid thinking_mode in fallback",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.provider_fallbacks.anthropic.blank.thinking_mode = "always-on";
|
|
}),
|
|
"thinking_mode",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid databricks_v2_wire_route in provider fallback
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: invalid wire_route in provider fallback is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"invalid wire_route in fallback",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.provider_fallbacks.anthropic.blank.databricks_v2_wire_route = "http-sse";
|
|
}),
|
|
"databricks_v2_wire_route",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: invalid default_effort in provider fallback (not in supported_efforts)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: default_effort not in supported_efforts in fallback is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"default_effort not in supported_efforts in fallback",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.provider_fallbacks.openai.blank.supported_efforts = ["low", "medium"];
|
|
m.provider_fallbacks.openai.blank.default_effort = "high"; // not in list
|
|
}),
|
|
"default_effort",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: family rule missing id
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: family rule missing id is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family rule missing id",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules.push({
|
|
match_kind: "prefix",
|
|
match_value: "test-",
|
|
providers: ["anthropic"],
|
|
match_priority: 1,
|
|
thinking_mode: "none",
|
|
supported_efforts: ["low"],
|
|
default_effort: null,
|
|
databricks_v2_wire_route: "not-applicable",
|
|
normalization_policy: "none",
|
|
// id deliberately omitted
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
"id",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: duplicate exact_record key (same provider + raw_model_id) is rejected
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: duplicate exact_record key is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"duplicate exact_record key",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
// Add a second record for the same (provider, raw_model_id) key
|
|
const existing = m.exact_records.find(
|
|
(r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini",
|
|
);
|
|
m.exact_records.push({ ...existing });
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record registry_label with empty label is rejected
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record registry_label with empty string is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record registry_label empty string",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find(
|
|
(r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini",
|
|
);
|
|
rec.registry_label = "";
|
|
}),
|
|
"nonempty",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: duplicate databricks_v2_known_models IDs
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: duplicate databricks_v2_known_models ID is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"duplicate known model ID",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.databricks_v2_known_models = ["databricks-gpt-5-5", "databricks-gpt-5-5"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: unsafe characters in match_value (family rule)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: family rule match_value with unsafe chars is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family rule match_value with backslash",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
// Inject a backslash into an existing rule's match_value — would break Rust string literal
|
|
const rule = m.family_rules.find((r) => r.id === "anthropic-manual-budget-claude3");
|
|
rule.match_value = "claude-3\\evil";
|
|
}),
|
|
"unsafe",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: unsafe characters in known-model ID
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: databricks_v2_known_models ID with unsafe chars is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"known-model ID with double-quote",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.databricks_v2_known_models = ['databricks-gpt-5-5', 'bad"id'];
|
|
}),
|
|
"unsafe",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: unsafe characters in exact_record registry_label
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record registry_label with unsafe chars is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record registry_label with backslash",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.registry_label = "GPT-5.4 Mini\\injected";
|
|
}),
|
|
"unsafe",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record supported_efforts_override must be non-empty
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record empty supported_efforts_override is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record empty supported_efforts_override",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.supported_efforts_override = [];
|
|
}),
|
|
"supported_efforts_override",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record supported_efforts_override with invalid enum value
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record supported_efforts_override with bogus enum is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record bogus effort enum",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.supported_efforts_override = ["ultra-high"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"supported_efforts_override",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record supported_efforts_override with duplicate effort
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record supported_efforts_override with duplicate effort is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record duplicate effort",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.supported_efforts_override = ["low", "low"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record supported_efforts_override must follow canonical order
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record supported_efforts_override out of canonical order is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record efforts out of order",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
// Reverse order — [high, medium, low] is not canonical [low, medium, high]
|
|
rec.supported_efforts_override = ["high", "medium", "low"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"canonical order",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record default_effort not in supported_efforts_override
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record default_effort not in supported_efforts_override is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record default_effort outside override",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.supported_efforts_override = ["low", "medium"];
|
|
rec.default_effort = "high"; // not in override
|
|
}),
|
|
"default_effort",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record match_priority must be a non-negative integer
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record match_priority non-integer is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record match_priority non-integer",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.match_priority = "five";
|
|
}),
|
|
"match_priority",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record thinking_mode must be a valid enum
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record invalid thinking_mode is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record invalid thinking_mode",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.thinking_mode = "turbo-thinking";
|
|
}),
|
|
"thinking_mode",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record databricks_v2_wire_route must be a valid enum
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record invalid databricks_v2_wire_route is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record invalid wire_route",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.databricks_v2_wire_route = "http-sse";
|
|
}),
|
|
"databricks_v2_wire_route",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record normalization_policy must be a valid enum
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record invalid normalization_policy is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record invalid normalization_policy",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
rec.normalization_policy = "pass-through-all";
|
|
}),
|
|
"normalization_policy",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: family_rule match_priority must be a non-negative integer
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: family_rule match_priority string (injection vector) is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family_rule string match_priority",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
// Inject a string that contains a compile_error! macro — must be rejected before emission
|
|
m.family_rules[0].match_priority = 'compile_error!("THUFIR_INJECTED")';
|
|
}),
|
|
"match_priority",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("schema-negative: family_rule match_priority negative integer is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family_rule negative match_priority",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].match_priority = -1;
|
|
}),
|
|
"match_priority",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("schema-negative: family_rule match_priority float is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family_rule float match_priority",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].match_priority = 1.5;
|
|
}),
|
|
"match_priority",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record uppercase duplicate key is rejected (after lowercasing)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record uppercase duplicate key is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record uppercase duplicate key",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
// Add an uppercase copy of an existing exact record key
|
|
const existing = m.exact_records[0];
|
|
m.exact_records.push({
|
|
...existing,
|
|
provider: existing.provider.toUpperCase(),
|
|
raw_model_id: existing.raw_model_id.toUpperCase(),
|
|
});
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate exact_record key",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: exact_record inherited default_effort not in inherited supported_efforts
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: exact_record inherited default_effort outside materialized supported_efforts is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"exact_record inherited default out of materialized efforts",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
// Override supported_efforts_override to a single value that excludes the family default.
|
|
// For any exact record that inherits family default_effort, override efforts to exclude it.
|
|
const rec = m.exact_records.find((r) => r.raw_model_id === "databricks-gpt-5-4-mini");
|
|
// Family default for the gpt5-4 rule is "medium". Override to only ["low"] to force mismatch.
|
|
rec.supported_efforts_override = ["low"];
|
|
// No explicit default_effort — inherits "medium" from family, but "medium" is not in ["low"]
|
|
}),
|
|
"materialized default_effort",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: family_rule supported_efforts must have no duplicates
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: family_rule supported_efforts with duplicate is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family_rule duplicate effort",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].supported_efforts = ["low", "low", "medium"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate effort",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: family_rule supported_efforts must follow canonical order
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: family_rule supported_efforts out of canonical order is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"family_rule efforts out of order",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
m.family_rules[0].supported_efforts = ["high", "low", "medium"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"canonical order",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: provider_fallback supported_efforts must have no duplicates
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: provider_fallback supported_efforts with duplicate is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"provider_fallback duplicate effort",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const provider = Object.keys(m.provider_fallbacks)[0];
|
|
m.provider_fallbacks[provider].blank.supported_efforts = ["low", "low", "medium"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"duplicate effort",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Rule: provider_fallback supported_efforts must follow canonical order
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
test("schema-negative: provider_fallback supported_efforts out of canonical order is rejected", () => {
|
|
assertRejects(
|
|
"provider_fallback efforts out of order",
|
|
mutate((m) => {
|
|
const provider = Object.keys(m.provider_fallbacks)[0];
|
|
m.provider_fallbacks[provider].blank.supported_efforts = ["high", "low", "medium"];
|
|
}),
|
|
"canonical order",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
console.log("\nSchema-negative validator tests complete.");
|