jerry/buzz

mirror of https://github.com/block/buzz.git synced 2026-10-27 20:41:57 +00:00

Files

Max Lampert b85d680fb1 perf(desktop): stop the Projects fan refetching on re-entry and running after leave (#6458 )

Entering Projects fires a large fan: an exhaustive paginated relay
enumeration (projects/repos/tombstones), five 2,000-event work-item
queries plus assignment-operation scans, per-repo activity summaries,
and a local-repository filesystem scan. Measured on a large community
(101 issues / 258 PRs):

| query | measured cost |
|---|---|
| work-items (5 × 2,000-event REQs + assignment scans) | 3.5–3.9s |
| activity summaries | 4.1s |
| repository activity | 1.0–2.2s |
| local repository scan | 1.7s |

Two lifecycle bugs made the fan far more expensive than it needs to be:

- **Freshness windows guaranteed a full refetch on nearly every
re-entry** (60s enumeration, 30s work-items/activity, 10s local scan) —
i.e., the costs above were re-paid on almost every visit. Every local
write path already invalidates its keys explicitly (issue/PR mutations,
project creation, repo sync), so the short windows only served
remote-actor freshness. Raised to 5m/2m/2m with a 30m enumeration cache:
re-entries now paint from cache, and the fan re-runs at most every 2–5
minutes.
- **Leaving Projects left the whole fan running**, competing with the
next surface's channel fetches on the same relay connection. AbortSignal
is now threaded through the enumeration and assignment pagination loops
(optional params — behavior identical without a signal), and leaving the
surface cancels the work-items query. Deliberately NOT cancelled: the
enumeration (the always-mounted sidebar projects section observes it and
its 30m cache is valuable), repo snapshots and local scans (native work
that can't abort — cancelling would discard the finished result and
force the same clones again), and activity summaries (a single bounded
request).

Abort behavior is covered by red-first unit tests on both pagination
loops. Remaining follow-up (out of scope): the queries themselves want a
relay-side aggregate instead of shipping thousands of events to compute
counts client-side.

---------

Signed-off-by: Max Lampert <maxwell@squareup.com>

2026-08-21 17:40:35 -06:00