Files
buzz/benchmarks/buzz-dataset/reply-to-thread
Salman Mohammed 79df468255 Add Buzz benchmark evaluation layers (#6823)
## Summary

- classify every Buzz-native benchmark task as `regression` or
`workflow`
- add metadata-backed `--layer` selection with k=1 regression and k=3
workflow defaults, while preserving explicit `--attempts`/`-k`
- split an unqualified mixed Buzz dataset run into two Harbor jobs so
each layer gets the correct default
- document the layer contract and cover metadata, selection, defaults,
overrides, invalid input, and command construction

---------

Signed-off-by: Salman Mohammed <smohammed@squareup.com>
2026-08-26 17:41:56 -04:00
..

reply-to-thread

What the agent does

Answers a six-month financial projection posted by the trial user (instruction.md). The arithmetic is incidental — this task measures where the answer lands: in the user's thread, not as a new top-level channel message.

The instruction deliberately says nothing about threading. Threading is the behavior under test, and it must come from buzz-acp's production base prompt rather than from the task prompt. Do not "fix" the instruction by telling the agent to reply in-thread — that would make the task measure instruction-following instead of product behavior.

Environment

python:3.12-slim-bookworm, no extra packages: the agent never runs in this container's shell. BuzzOrchestraAgent launches the real buzz-acp / buzz-agent stack against a dedicated relay, and the agent works entirely through Buzz. Agent timeout 300s; the manifest's trial_budget is the effective clock.

Verifier

Reads the post-agent /logs/artifacts/buzz-evidence.json snapshot (written by BuzzContainerRuntime._collect_evidence after the agent stops, so the agent cannot influence it). Every dimension is programmatic; reward is the conjunction of all of them.

Dimension Type Measures
evidence_complete programmatic Snapshot is v1, untruncated, has one orchestrator, and resolves the task event and a candidate reply. Harness health, not agent skill — a 0 here means investigate the run
expected_author programmatic The scored message was published by the orchestrator
same_channel programmatic Reply carries the trial channel's h tag
reply_to_thread programmatic Reply carries ["e", <task event>, "", "reply"] — the behavior under test
answer_correct programmatic Month-6 revenue (160,811), month-6 expenses (84,462), and cumulative profit (374,470), each ±1 and each on a line naming it

answer_correct requires the label and the value on the same line so a work-showing table with a wrong stated answer cannot pass on its intermediate rows. instruction.md asks for that formatting explicitly.

Layout

reply-to-thread/
├── instruction.md          # Prompt posted to the agent as the trial user
├── task.toml               # Metadata, timeouts, 1 CPU / 1 GiB environment
├── environment/Dockerfile  # Bare python image; the relay stack is uploaded
└── tests/
    ├── test.sh             # Runs verify.py against the evidence snapshot
    └── verify.py           # Deterministic scorer (see table above)

Running

just benchmark \
  --path benchmarks/buzz-dataset/reply-to-thread \
  --attempts 1 \
  --manifest benchmarks/harbor-buzz-orchestra/manifests/buzz-native-solo-luna.yaml \
  --endpoint-config benchmarks/harbor-buzz-orchestra/testbed/endpoints/openai-live.json \
  --n-concurrent 1

harbor run -a oracle does not work here, and no solution/solve.sh is shipped: the Oracle agent replaces BuzzOrchestraAgent, so no relay trial is provisioned and no evidence snapshot is exported. The verifier is covered instead by positive and negative fixture tests in ../harbor-buzz-orchestra/tests/test_reply_to_thread_verifier.py (run from benchmarks/harbor-buzz-orchestra: uv run --extra dev pytest -q).