apex-mcp-server/docs/architecture/non-custodial-split.md

Non-Custodial Split Architecture

Status: approved · Date: 2026-07-27

Why the Vector MCP server is moving from seed-phrase-as-a-parameter to a keyless hosted builder plus a local signer, and the PR sequence that gets us there.

---

1. Problem

Every signing tool on the Vector MCP server takes the user's BIP39 seed phrase as a call parameter. Because the LLM must emit that parameter to invoke the tool, the seed travels through the MCP client, the model provider's context window and request logs, the network, and finally the process memory of the hosted server. A seed is root custody: unlimited, irrevocable, unscopable.

The server's spend limits and rate limits are app-layer only, so they do not constrain anyone who has captured the seed. They are also process-global singletons, so on the hosted box every user shares one daily budget, one rate limit, and one audit file.

2. Goal

The agent holds its own key. The shared server never sees a seed.

Success criteria:

1. No hosted tool accepts a mnemonic or private key. Grep-able: zero mnemonic params in the builder package.
2. The signing key never enters the model context, never crosses the network.
3. Spend policy is enforced where it is actually enforceable — locally, per user.
4. Every PR in the series is independently reviewable and leaves main coherent.

3. Decisions (locked)

Decision	Choice
Deployment reality	Hosted multi-tenant is flagship → seed-to-server is P0
Architecture	Keyless hosted builder + local companion signer
Repo topology	Single repo, npm workspaces monorepo
Migration	Hard cut per family — no dual-mode, no deprecation window
Key storage	Pluggable KeySource; v1 = env var / 0600 file
Signer policy	Decode tx → net outflow → limits → audit → sign. Fully autonomous
Tool flow	4 calls: get_address → build_* → sign → submit
Tool naming	Explicit build_* / signer_* / submit_* prefixes
Cross-cutting fixes	Entangled ones inline; independent ones as separate small PRs
Rollout	Testnet auto-deploys and may break; mainnet held until complete
Testing	TDD — tests written first
Auth	Enforced when MCP_AUTH_TOKENS is configured
Delivery	Claude implements and opens PRs; David/Časlav review and merge

4. Architecture

mcp-server/                                   npm workspaces root
├── packages/
│   ├── shared/    @apexfusion/vector-mcp-shared
│   │     exports "./tx"        pure CBOR, types, formatting — NO network
│   │     exports "./provider"  OgmiosProvider, endpoints    — network
│   ├── builder/   @apexfusion/vector-mcp-builder   HOSTED · keyless · network
│   └── signer/    @apexfusion/vector-mcp-signer    LOCAL  · holds key · no network

Two properties carry the security argument:

The signer has no network interface, inbound or outbound. It speaks stdio (the natural MCP local transport) — no port, no listener. Submission lives on the builder, so it has no egress either. The signer is a pure function: CBOR in → signed CBOR out, gated by policy.

The boundary is enforced by the module graph, not convention. shared uses subpath exports; the signer imports @apexfusion/vector-mcp-shared/tx and cannot reach /provider. A reviewer can verify the signer is network-free by reading its imports.

Why zero-network is possible

Net outflow is computable from the transaction body alone:

netOutflowLovelace = Σ { output.lovelace | output.address ∉ ownAddresses } + fee

No input resolution, therefore no chain access. Change returning to us is excluded automatically because its address is ours.

Known over-count: an output to the user's own wallet at a different derivation index is classified as foreign and counted as outflow. This fails safe (refuses too much, never too little) and is accepted for v1.

5. Components

Component	Package	Responsibility
OgmiosProvider	shared /provider	Chain queries + submit. Relocated unchanged.
CBOR / tx helpers	shared /tx	Decode, asset-name derivation, formatting. Pure.
Tool modules	builder	build_* per family, read-only queries, submit, await
Auth + rate limit	builder	Bearer token; per-identity limits replace the global singleton
KeySource	signer	getSigningKey(). v1: EnvKeySource, FileKeySource (0600)
PolicyEngine	signer	evaluate(decoded, ownAddresses) → { allowed, reason, netOutflow }
SpendLimitPolicy	signer	Ported safety.ts, now per-user and enforceable
Audit log	signer	Local, per-user

PolicyEngine is an interface with one v1 implementation so recipient-allowlist and threshold-approval land later without touching the sign path.

Interfaces

interface KeySource {
  getSigningKey(): Promise<PrivateKey>;
  getAddress(): Promise<string>;
}

interface PolicyDecision {
  allowed: boolean;
  reason?: string;
  netOutflowLovelace: bigint;
  assetMovements: AssetMovement[];
}

interface Policy {
  evaluate(tx: DecodedTx, ownAddresses: string[]): PolicyDecision;
}

6. Data flow

1. vector_signer_get_address                    → { address }              [signer]
2. vector_build_send_apex                       → { txCbor, summary, fee } [builder, keyless]
     { changeAddress, recipientAddress, amount }
3. vector_signer_sign                           → { signedTxCbor }         [signer, key]
     { txCbor }    decode → net outflow → policy → audit → sign
4. vector_submit_transaction                    → { txHash, explorerUrl }  [builder]
     { signedTxCbor }

vector_signer_decode_transaction is a read-only preview so an agent can show a human what it is about to sign.

Accepted trade-off of the 4-call shape: the signer records intent to spend at signing time, not confirmed submission. If a submit later fails, the audit log over-counts. Conservative, therefore acceptable — and it is the price of the signer having no network access. Documented, not hidden.

Two-step governance flow

submit_proposal is a lock-then-spend pair with a confirmation wait between. Keyless, that orchestration becomes explicit:

build_self_improvement_proposal_lock → sign → submit → await_transaction
  → build_self_improvement_proposal_spend(lockTxHash) → sign → submit

This is why governance is the last family: the LLM must drive a stateful, multi-transaction sequence.

7. Tool inventory

Builder — 24 tools, zero keys.

Group	Tools
Read-only (8, unchanged)	get_balance, get_utxos, get_transaction_history, dry_run, discover_agents, get_agent_profile, self_improvement_browse, self_improvement_analyze_metrics
Build — tx (3)	build_send_apex, build_send_tokens, build_transaction
Build — contracts (2)	build_deploy_contract, build_interact_contract
Build — registry (5)	build_register_agent, build_update_agent, build_transfer_agent, build_deregister_agent, build_message_agent
Build — governance (4)	build_self_improvement_proposal_lock, build_self_improvement_proposal_spend, build_self_improvement_critique, build_self_improvement_endorse
Chain ops (2, new)	submit_transaction, await_transaction

Signer — 4 tools, holds the key.

signer_get_address · signer_decode_transaction · signer_sign · signer_get_spend_limits

Removed: vector_get_address (replaced by signer_get_address), vector_get_spend_limits (moved to signer).

8. Error handling

The signer fails closed. Any CBOR it cannot fully parse, any unrecognised output type, any address it cannot classify as ours-or-foreign → refuse. A signer that guesses is worthless. Refusals return a structured reason the agent relays verbatim: "net outflow 250.00 AP3X exceeds per-transaction limit 100.00 AP3X".

The builder never fabricates. Submission returns a real error when it fails, never a synthesised or placeholder result.

9. Testing

TDD throughout: failing test before implementation, every PR.

Layer	Coverage	Wallet	Network
shared	Golden CBOR encode/decode, asset-name derivation	no	no
builder	Fixture UTxOs + mocked provider → assert structure, fee, change	no	no
signer	Adversarial (below)	throwaway key	no
integration	build→sign→submit round trip	funded testnet	yes

Mandatory adversarial cases for the signer — these are the security boundary:

• Drain to a foreign address exceeding the limit → refused
• Change returning to own address → excluded from net outflow
• Malformed / truncated CBOR → refused, never signed
• Unrecognised output type → refused
• Daily limit accumulation across multiple signs → enforced
• Fee included in net outflow

Only the integration layer needs anything from Filip: a funded Vector testnet wallet.

10. PR sequence

Spine (ordered)

PR	Content	Breaks testnet
1	CI harness: build + unit tests. Ships this design doc into docs/architecture/ so reviewers have the rationale	no
2	MCP SDK upgrade + fix 8 type errors + restructure tool registration + typecheck becomes a hard gate	no
3	Workspace scaffolding — pure git mv, zero logic change, validated by PR 1–2 CI	no
4	Signer package (purely additive): KeySource, decode, PolicyEngine, audit, 4 tools. Heavy TDD	no
5	Builder hardening: auth (enforced when configured), per-identity rate limits, submit_transaction, await_transaction	no
6	Family 1 — wallet/tx keyless. Mnemonics removed; build_* tools land	yes
7	Family 2 — agent registry keyless. Drops @ts-nocheck from agent-network.ts	yes
8	Family 3 — governance keyless. Plus env-driven ref-UTxO config and a CBOR encoding fix	yes
9	Mainnet cutover: README, security-page correction, deliberate workflow_dispatch	—

PR 4 is the review that matters. It is additive, self-contained, and is the security boundary. It breaks nothing while Časlav reads it.

PR 2 rationale: main does not currently typecheck (§12). Gating CI on a red tree is impossible, so the gate is established before any refactor lands on top of it.

Independent singles (any order, parallel)

PR	Fix
A	Koios v2 default; reconcile .env.example / docker-compose
B	engines.node floor; postinstall symlink hack
C	Submission error handling
D	min(1) APEX floor → real dust floor
E	Endpoint URLs in error text
F	SSE → Streamable HTTP
G	Float → bigint money math
H	Dependency updates

Plus: hold the "never stored server-side" reassurance line on the existing open PR #2 — do not publish a safety claim about a design being removed.

Dependency graph

PR1 ─→ PR2 ─→ PR3 ─┬─→ PR4 (signer)           ─┐
                   └─→ PR5 (builder hardening) ─┴─→ PR6 ─→ PR7 ─→ PR8 ─→ PR9

A…H  independent of the spine and of each other — land any time

PR 4 and PR 5 both depend on the workspace split (PR 3) and can proceed in parallel; PR 6 needs both, because the first keyless family requires a signer to sign with and a submit_transaction to submit through.

11. Rollout

Testnet auto-deploys on push to main (deploy.yml) and is the proving ground — breaking it from PR 6 onward is expected and useful signal. Mainnet deploys only by manual workflow_dispatch and stays on the last custodial image until PR 9. This uses the existing CI split as designed; no new infrastructure.

12. Findings from local verification

Verified locally on Windows 11, Node v25.8.0 / npm 11.11.0: npm ci clean in 16 s (396 packages), tsup build succeeds (131 KB, 67 ms).

Verification caveat: local Node is 25.8.0; the Dockerfile deploys on node:22-alpine, and package.json claims >=14. Local green does not prove green on the deploy runtime. PR 1's CI must pin the Node 22 matrix so the gate matches production, and PR B corrects the declared floor.

npm run typecheck fails on main — 8 errors, all src/vector/vector.ts.

512,3 · 702,3 · 782,3 · 920,3 · 990,3 · 1192,3 · 1250,3   TS2589  instantiation excessively deep
1250,10                                                    TS2769  no overload — z.record(z.string()).optional()

CI only runs npm run build, and tsup/esbuild strips types without checking them, so this has never been caught.

This corrects an earlier misattribution. The @ts-nocheck headers are attributed in-code to "Cardano WASM imports," but the real cause is server.tool() generic inference exceeding TypeScript's instantiation depth on rich Zod schemas — the same failure leaking out of the one file lacking the escape hatch. Removing @ts-nocheck therefore requires restructuring tool registration, not a cleanup pass. Suspected root cause is the stale @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@^1.4.1, which would also explain the deprecated SSE transport — unverified; PR 2 opens with a timeboxed spike.

13. Residual risks

Native-asset outflow is not limited in v1. Spend limits apply to lovelace. A transaction moving ~2 AP3X plus a valuable NFT to a foreign address passes the lovelace check. Blanket-denying asset outflow is not viable because legitimate registry flows mint an NFT to the registry script address.

v1 mitigation: all asset movements are decoded, logged, and returned in the policy decision, and assetOutflowPolicy is configurable (allow default | deny | allowlist) for high-value wallets. Stated as a known limitation, not glossed. Post-v1: per-policy asset rules.

Key at rest is plaintext in v1 (env var or 0600 file). The win is that the key is local and never transits the LLM or a shared host — not that it is in an HSM. KeySource exists so keychain/HSM/hardware land later without touching the sign path.

Prompt injection is mitigated, not eliminated. The signer refuses transactions violating policy, but an injected LLM can still cause any transaction within policy. Recipient allowlisting is the next lever.

SDK upgrade may not resolve TS2589. PR 2's scope is contingent on the spike; if the upgrade does not fix it, fall back to extracting schemas into typed constants and re-scope PR 2.

14. Open items

1. Funded Vector testnet wallet needed from Filip for integration-layer verification. Without it, pre-PR testing proves CBOR structure but not chain acceptance.
2. PR 2 spike result determines whether the SDK upgrade is in scope or the type errors are patched directly.