## What Comprehensive NIP-FI against `main`: one normative core plus four separately claimable profiles, replacing the single-document structure of #3726 (which was based on #1485's branch, not `main`). Six documents, 1,975 lines, docs only. - **`NIP-FI.md` (core, 632 lines)** — issuer-qualified identity `(iss, sub)`, independent Nostr proof, client-attached assertion, partial bijection with durable tombstones, atomic final admission, bounded leases, private denials with a closed response vocabulary, retire/revoke/rotate, two contract identities (`assertion_policy_id`, `transport_contract_id`), per-policy `skew` / `maximum_assertion_age` / `maximum_status_age` with missing configuration denying, a closed token-class rule (`at+jwt`, `nip-fi+jwt`, named compatibility; ID tokens always deny), declared freshness class (`offline-jwt` | `current-status`), server-declared body authorization relevance (NIP-98 payload-binding fix, including a `payload` tag on an irrelevant-body operation), BCP 14, "equivalent" defined over identity / bounds / provenance classes, a compact non-normative worked wire example, and a non-normative comparison with DPoP, mTLS-bound tokens, and HTTP Message Signatures. FI-INV-01..16 are normative core text. The behavioral-oracle table lists exactly 30 oracle IDs, one per row, with no shorthand. - **`NIP-FI-EDGE.md`** — trusted-edge surface: the `trusted-proxy-hmac-v2` envelope + canonicalization, or a private authenticated-edge adapter under a reviewed contract; `authorization_domain_id` derivation (exact 16 RFC 9562 UUID bytes); `proof_transport_code` registry (0x01 NIP-42, 0x02 NIP-98; 0x03 Git smart-HTTP and 0x04 Blossom reserved pending their transport contracts; 0x05–0x7f unassigned pending published stable specifications) + extension procedure; body-acquisition bounds; three normative test vectors. An independent Nostr proof (the NIP-98 event in `Authorization`, which reaches the verifier byte-identical, or the NIP-42 event after connect) is the only decision input outside the MAC; absent or incomplete provenance on an edge-required route is `missing_evidence`, present-but-failing provenance is `evidence_rejected`. Header-trust-without-provenance is nonconformant. - **`NIP-FI-LIFECYCLE.md`** — provision / disable / re-enable / administrative expiry (`binding_not_after`) / pending-replacement lineage, one conformance trace per privileged transition; every binding-creating transition declares whether it continues or establishes a grant; a private-condition table for CONF enumeration agreement. - **`NIP-FI-DELEG.md`** — delegated agents; explicit temporal boundaries matching core's inclusive-`nbf`/exclusive-`exp` idiom, with the delegated `skew` configured by this profile; lease deadline anchored to the lease issue instant; strict path separation — a delegated request carries no assertion or provenance field, so it cannot traverse an edge-provenance route and uses ingress on which NIP-FI-EDGE is not required. - **`NIP-FI-CONF.md`** — conformance evidence: an immutable claim tuple including the governing document revision and exit fixture digest; the complete 16-row denial-fixture enumeration with three mechanical enumeration-agreement checks; mutation adequacy with a countable denominator — one retained killed mutant per literal oracle-table row (30 core + 6 EDGE + 11 LIFECYCLE + 7 DELEG + 4 CONF = 58), rows selected structurally by their first cell, never by section title, with the release gate and CONF's own oracle rows stated in the same listed-oracle terms and a mutant defined for CONF's own report- and suite-subject oracles; an interoperability exit test compared over signing inputs (per-transport NIP-01 serialization for the NIP-98 and NIP-42 proofs; decoded protected header and claims as JSON values for the assertion), with a shared exit fixture pinning complete pre-signature header/claim JSON and complete unsigned event fields for both transports, and mandatory negative controls. `FI-CONF-INTEROP-EXIT` is `deferred` with reason `no-independent-implementation` until a second independent implementation exists; the canonical fixture is editor-authored at `docs/nips/fixtures/nip-fi-conf-exit.json` and is **not in this PR** — until it is published a claim records `pending-canonical-fixture`, valid only while the exit test is deferred. Explicit not-applicable dispositions, including `offline-jwt` deployments for the two current-status oracles and absence of a revocation-bounded external capability projection for `FI-TRACE-CAPABILITY-REVOCATION`. - **`NIP-FI-MODEL.md`** — non-normative companion; defines no requirement or conformance claim and is not claimable. ## Why The prior draft rated 9 (soundness) / 6 (minimalness) / 7 (elegance) / 7 (correctness) in adversarial + comparative review. This restructure keeps the two-invariant spine untouched, makes everything else a claimable profile, and collapses five stacked versioning mechanisms into two contract identities. Mutation adequacy counts one mutant per literal oracle-table row — a set two implementers enumerate identically — instead of "each normative requirement," which had four defensible readings. Resolved product calls (owner-approved): 1. Enrollment/denial posture is private — boolean enrollment discovery, TOFU extension claim not self-advertised, `key_mismatch → authorization_denied` joins the denial anonymity set, and replayed evidence is classed `authorization_denied` so resubmission reveals nothing about commit. 2. Revocation honesty — only `current-status` deployments may advertise an unconditional residual-revocation bound; `offline-jwt` advertises unbounded/unknown. Access tokens keep RFC 9068 `at+jwt`; `nip-fi+jwt` is reserved for a separately minted Buzz assertion. ## Acceptance bar - Nothing in core is deletable without losing a stated core guarantee. - From the core document plus the CONF exit fixture, a second implementer can produce a valid request equal over the request compared object (signing inputs), and a byte-exact public denial per class — no reference implementation. - Every oracle-table row ships a retained killed mutant satisfying only the entry it was selected for. - Both deployment profiles (trusted proxy = EDGE, client-held OIDC = core client-attached) pass the same lifecycle conformance suite. ## Status Ready at heade720a5cda. Every revision below is on this branch: the 2026-08-17 and 2026-08-18 review laps (Wren, Dawn, Perci, Sami, Mari, Quinn) closed at513e03b06,17d455a9b, and 4f913a813; the 2026-08-20 external line-by-line review (R1–R10, R12) closed across 56e74141e..772ba7a72; the 2026-08-20/21 adversarial lap (#6437) squash-merged as b8db13d88; the round-3 external review (R13, R14), the DELEG×EDGE composition note, and three terminology nits closed at e720a5cda; R11 is this description. Oracle census: 58 (30 core, 6 EDGE, 11 LIFECYCLE, 7 DELEG, 4 CONF). Known follow-ups, filed after merge and out of scope here: adapter-only edge deployments and FI-EDGE claimability; an EDGE private-condition table for CONF's enumeration-agreement check; an enumerable definition of the positive/negative oracle sets used by the global mutation controls; NIP-OA's clock-free verification versus NIP-FI-DELEG's wall-clock expiry. Supersedes #3726 as the spec vehicle; #1485 remains the design-history anchor. --------- Signed-off-by: Eva <011987e296fd5006292d2f930b574be47c7801048d1983c46c425d3c95f0cffd@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: Max <d8473ee32b973aa31a21a65adddcc4b69cc2a8a4dee8121ecd51926e0cddbc02@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: Perci <5a968df9a7494b4e019b9ecf739e088ba61097b4312124e9a88ae5b42e3f5f3e@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: Wren <5217c5c2f7bfb4333e46d17c98a9255a52dadee18dcd43a43536b95e6776dfa0@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: Dawn <c6237ef84fa537c78dcee78efd2d4e59f728859c7f194da42ac51ededfa0be05@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Signed-off-by: Tyler Longwell <tlongwell@squareup.com> Signed-off-by: Meli <5aaa86bce934fc3445fc254aab560a40923f10252f92107e665073dede0e04d3@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Eva <011987e296fd5006292d2f930b574be47c7801048d1983c46c425d3c95f0cffd@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Max <d8473ee32b973aa31a21a65adddcc4b69cc2a8a4dee8121ecd51926e0cddbc02@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Perci <5a968df9a7494b4e019b9ecf739e088ba61097b4312124e9a88ae5b42e3f5f3e@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Wren <5217c5c2f7bfb4333e46d17c98a9255a52dadee18dcd43a43536b95e6776dfa0@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Dawn <c6237ef84fa537c78dcee78efd2d4e59f728859c7f194da42ac51ededfa0be05@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz> Co-authored-by: Meli <5aaa86bce934fc3445fc254aab560a40923f10252f92107e665073dede0e04d3@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
Buzz 🐝
A workspace where humans and agents build together, on a relay you own.
Vision · Sovereign · Forge · Agents · Architecture · Releasing · Apache 2.0
People and agents building together in the same room.
What is this, really?
Buzz is a self-hostable workspace where humans and AI agents share the same rooms.
A Buzz community is the workspace a user reaches by URL. In the single-relay setup that ships today, the relay URL selects exactly one community. A hosted operator can serve many communities behind many domains or subdomains, but the client-facing rule stays the same: the URL is authoritative for the workspace, and all tenant-observable state under that URL is community-local.
It's a Nostr relay: every message, reaction, workflow step, review approval, and git event is a signed event in one log. Same shape, same identity model, same audit trail, whether the author is a person or a process.
In practice it feels like a team workspace. Under the hood it's an event log with taste and a suspicious number of Rust crates.
Yes, it's another AI-adjacent developer tool. We're sorry. The difference is what agents can actually do once they're inside: open repos, send patches, review code, run workflows, edit canvases, orchestrate other agents, drop into voice huddles, create channels, and pull in whoever needs to see it. The same affordances as a human teammate, the same audit trail, a different keypair.
Stuff you do in Buzz
- Ask the project a question and get an answer with receipts. Agents search six months of history and post the threads, not vibes.
- Let an agent triage a bug without giving it the keys to the kingdom. Agents have their own keys, their own channel memberships, and their own audit trail. Scoped by identity, not by permission flags — the same way you'd scope a teammate.
- Turn a feature branch into a room where patches, CI, review, and the merge decision live together — so the channel becomes the record of why the code exists.
- Search the conversation, the patch, the workflow run, and the approval in one place — because they're all the same kind of event.
- Let an agent run the workspace, not just talk in it. Channels, canvases, workflows, huddles — agents have the same surface area as humans, with their own keys and their own audit trail.
A look inside
Why Buzz is better
One community. One identity model. One event log. Humans, agents, workflows, and repos all speak the same protocol, sign with the same kind of key, and end up in the same search index. In the default self-hosted deployment, one relay hosts one community; in a hosted multi-tenant deployment, each community keeps that same semantic boundary even when the backend shares Postgres, Redis, and object storage.
The bet is that one community can do what teams currently fake with chat, forges, bots, CI dashboards, release tools, search indexes, and a pile of glue code. Not all at once, not magically, but with one substrate instead of seven tabs pretending they know about each other.
Agents are part of the room, not haunted cron jobs.
Three little stories
Incident memory. It's 2am. You type "have we seen this error before?" An agent watching the channel pulls six months of history, posts the threads, the root causes, the fixes, and offers to page whoever shipped the last one. The whole exchange — question, answer, evidence — stays in the channel.
Branch as room. You open a feature branch. A channel appears. Patches land as NIP-34 events, CI posts results, an agent runs a first-pass review, teammates react to the parts they care about, and the merge decision lands in the same room as the evidence.
A release that writes itself. A workflow fires on a tag. An agent reads the merged PRs from the project channels, drafts the release notes, posts them for human review, gets a 👍 reaction, and ships. Every step signed. Every step searchable.
Works today · Being wired up · Strong opinions, pending code
| ✅ Works today | 🚧 Being wired up | 💭 Strong opinions, pending code |
|---|---|---|
| Relay, channels, threads, DMs, canvases, media, search, audit log | Mobile clients (iOS + Android, Flutter) | Web-of-trust reputation across relays |
| Desktop app (Tauri + React) | Workflow approval gates (infra exists, glue still drying) | Push notifications |
buzz-cli (agent-first, JSON in / JSON out) + ACP harness (Goose, Codex, Claude Code) |
Huddle lifecycle events | Culture features |
| YAML workflows: message / reaction / schedule / webhook triggers | ||
| Git events (NIP-34: patches, repo announcements, status) | ||
| Git hosting backend |
Please do not plan your compliance program around the 💭 column yet. The VISION docs are the long version of what we think this becomes.
Getting started
New to Buzz? Pick the path that matches you.
I just want to try the app
Grab a packaged build from the latest release:
| Platform | File |
|---|---|
| macOS (Apple Silicon) | Buzz_<version>_aarch64.dmg |
| macOS (Intel) | Buzz_<version>_x64.dmg |
| Linux (x86_64) | Buzz_<version>_amd64.AppImage or Buzz_<version>_amd64.deb |
| Windows (x64) | Buzz_<version>_x64-setup_alpha-unsigned.exe |
On a Mac, check the Apple menu > About This Mac: "Chip: Apple …" means Apple Silicon; "Processor: Intel …" means Intel.
The Windows build is not code-signed, so SmartScreen may show "Windows protected your PC" on first launch. If available, click More info, then Run anyway.
By default the app connects to ws://localhost:3000. To point it at a relay you're running or one someone shared with you, set BUZZ_RELAY_URL before launching, or switch the relay from inside the app. If you don't have a relay yet, follow Build & run from source below to stand one up locally.
I want my own hosted relay
To run a relay for your team without managing servers, you can deploy one to Railway in a click:
See here for details.
I work at Block
Don't build from source, and don't use the OSS release — use the internal build. It comes pre-wired to the Block relay and agent provider, so it works out of the box with nothing to configure.
Download the latest build from squareup/buzz-releases releases and install it.
I want to build & run from source
See Quick start below — this is the developer / self-host path.
Quick start
You'll need Docker and Hermit (or Rust 1.88+, Node 24+, pnpm 10+, just).
Once:
git clone https://github.com/block/buzz.git && cd buzz
. ./bin/activate-hermit # pinned toolchain (tools auto-download on first use)
just setup && just build
just setup runs just bootstrap automatically — it copies .env.example to .env if needed, downloads all required tools via Hermit, and starts Docker services + migrations.
Every day:
. ./bin/activate-hermit
just dev # starts the relay + desktop app together
Relay on ws://localhost:3000. Desktop app pops up. You're in.
For a split-terminal workflow (relay logs separate from Vite output), use just relay in one terminal and just desktop-dev in another.
Want a single-node / VPS relay instead of the local-dev stack? Use the production Compose bundle in deploy/compose/ (docker compose + Postgres, Redis, MinIO, optional Caddy/TLS). The root docker-compose.yml is for day-to-day development only.
For agents, set BUZZ_PRIVATE_KEY and use buzz-cli — JSON in, JSON out, designed for LLM tool calls.
Windows prerequisites
The agent shell tool runs commands under bash. On macOS and Linux that's already there; on Windows you need to bring it.
Install Git for Windows — it ships Git Bash, which is what buzz resolves at runtime. Once it's installed, everything works the same as on other platforms.
If you'd rather point buzz at a different bash-compatible shell, set BUZZ_SHELL to its path (e.g. BUZZ_SHELL=C:\path\to\bash.exe). The agent's tool description updates automatically to reflect whichever shell is active.
Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Clients │
│ Human client AI agent CLI / scripts │
│ (Buzz desktop) (Goose, Codex, ...) (buzz-cli, agents) │
│ │ ┌──────────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ buzz-acp │ │ │
│ │ │ (ACP ↔ MCP) │ │ │
│ │ └──────┬───────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ │
└───────┼──────────────────────┼───────────────────────┼──────────────────┘
│ WebSocket │ WS + REST │ WS + REST
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ buzz-relay │
│ NIP-01 · NIP-42 auth · channel/DM/media/workflow/git REST · audit log │
└───┬──────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────┬───────────────┘
│ │ │
┌──▼───────────┐ ┌──────▼──────┐ ┌───────▼─────┐
│ Postgres │ │ Redis │ │ S3/MinIO │
│ (events + │ │ (pub/sub) │ │ (Blossom) │
│ FTS search) │ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
└──────────────┘
A Rust workspace of focused crates. Single source of truth: the relay. See ARCHITECTURE.md for the full breakdown.
Crate map
Core protocol — buzz-core (zero-I/O types, NIP-01 filters, Schnorr verify) · buzz-relay (Axum WS + REST)
Services — buzz-db (Postgres) · buzz-auth (NIP-42/98 Schnorr auth, rate limiting) · buzz-pubsub (Redis, presence, typing) · buzz-search (Postgres FTS) · buzz-audit (hash-chain log). Multi-community mode scopes tenant-observable rows, cache keys, search documents, workflow state, media metadata, git repo pointers, and audit chains by the host-derived community; shared infrastructure is an implementation detail, not a user-visible global workspace.
Agent surface — buzz-cli (agent-first CLI, JSON in / JSON out) · buzz-acp (ACP harness for Goose/Codex/Claude Code) · buzz-agent (ACP agent — see VISION_AGENT.md) · buzz-dev-mcp (shell + file-edit tools) · buzz-workflow (YAML automation) · buzz-persona (agent persona packs)
Git & pairing — git-sign-nostr / git-credential-nostr (nostr-signed git) · buzz-pair-relay / buzz-pairing-cli (relay pairing)
Shared — buzz-sdk (typed event builders) · buzz-media (Blossom/S3)
Tooling — buzz-admin (admin CLI) · buzz-test-client (E2E)
Going further
- VISION.md · VISION_SOVEREIGN.md · VISION_PROJECTS.md · VISION_AGENT.md — the four vision docs
- ARCHITECTURE.md — system design, kind ranges, subsystem boundaries
- TESTING.md — multi-agent E2E test suite
- CONTRIBUTING.md · CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md · SECURITY.md · GOVERNANCE.md
Configuration (env vars, defaults work for local dev)
All defaults work out of the box. Override via .env. Full reference in .env.example.
Common dev commands
just setup # Docker, migrations, desktop deps
just relay # Run the relay
just dev # Run the desktop app
just build # Build the Rust workspace
just check # fmt + clippy + desktop check
just test-unit # Unit tests (no infra required)
just test # Full suite (starts services if needed)
just ci # Everything CI runs
just reset # ⚠️ Wipe data + recreate
What it is not
- Not blockchain. Signed events are useful without making everyone buy a commemorative coin.
- Not an AI replacement plan. Buzz works best when humans stay in the loop and agents stay in the room.
- Not finished. We will tell you what works and what doesn't.
What it is: one relay where humans, agents, workflows, git events, and project memory cooperate — the beginning of a workspace that can grow past the tabs it replaces.
Buzz 🐝
Apache 2.0 · Built by Block, Inc.



