Go to file
Brad Seiler 2cd40badb8 Manage community NIP-FI policy with enable, disable and status (#9176)
## Summary

Operators can enable, disable and inspect a community's stored NIP-FI
requirement through signed POST/GET
`/operator/communities/nip-fi-policy` and `buzz-admin nip-fi-policy`.
This replaces the old enable-only endpoint and drops the
`nip-fi-upgrade` command added earlier in this PR, along with obsolete
compatibility code.

Each saved intent binds its desired state and observed generation/state.
Every accepted new intent advances the generation, including same-state
changes. Committed retries recover history without reapplying policy;
stale requests are refused. Current status exposes one pair of reusable
`expected_*` preconditions. Historical receipts remain readable after
policy changes or target deletion, including old rows with null
preconditions. Their UUIDs cannot be reused for new requests.

Migration 0085 stays additive; main’s default-channel recovery migration
retains version 0084. It preserves old receipt rows and INSERT
compatibility. Operator instructions cover use, recovery and client
migration: [usage
guide](33a1c0bb87/docs/operator-nip-fi-upgrade.md),
[client
contract](33a1c0bb87/docs/operator-nip-fi-policy-client.md).

### Rollout and containment

The old `/operator/communities/nip-fi-upgrade` route is removed; GET and
POST return 404 without its old auth handler. A pending sponsorship
client still targets that route. Migrate that client to the supported
API and deploy it with mutation dispatch paused before this relay
version reaches its fleet. Its complete CAS preconditions must be
durably saved before first dispatch and reused unchanged after a crash
or lost response. This is a pending integration dependency, not a claim
that the caller is deployed.

Close `BUZZ_NIP_FI_UPGRADES_ENABLED` on every old relay. Keep
`BUZZ_NIP_FI_CHANGES=false` on new relays. Apply schema first and finish
the whole-fleet rollout before opening the new gate and resuming
migrated clients. Before opening the new gate, verify the deployed
artifact SHA on every pod and probe each pod directly: the old route
must return 404, and a fresh, well-formed, signed policy request with a
new UUID must return 503 `upgrades_disabled`. A committed retry is not a
gate probe. Old pods with the old gate open can still accept unfenced
enables. Do not roll back to those writers after a policy operation. The
old variable is no longer read by this version; the new gate defaults
off and controls both directions.

Read accepted intent in `receipt`, current preconditions/effective
policy through status, and effective discovery through `/info`. Enable
stays `pending` because receipts cannot certify fleet-wide socket
closure. Under global `enforce`, stored disable leaves FI effectively
required. Closing the gate preserves receipt recovery; use a fresh CAS
disable or existing archive controls for containment. Preserve uncertain
requests and their UUIDs. This PR performs no live state change or
deployment.

### Related issue

N/A

### Testing

Published repair head: `33a1c0bb87a6fa10212eb4ec60788e24189627e2`,
incorporating main `39d5159caf`. The Git policy guards now apply only to
matched paths. Unknown GET/POST paths on relays without a web directory
return 404 instead of inheriting the internal endpoint’s 403. The
matched internal endpoint retains its localhost restriction and 1 MB
body limit, including its method fallback. The signed removed-route 404
assertion is unchanged.

Main’s migration 0084 is unchanged; the additive policy migration is now
0085 with identical SQL. Its populated-receipt upgrade test starts at
schema 84. Formatting and commit hooks pass; independent source review
has no findings. At this exact head, formatting, all-target Clippy (`-D
warnings`, relay/db/admin/pubsub), and test compilation (relay/db/admin,
`--lib --tests --no-run`) pass with exit 0. The full native PostgreSQL
lane passes: 1,373/1,373 tests, exit 0, including the unchanged signed
removed-route 404 assertion, fresh-database migration and populated
receipt upgrade from main schema 84 to 85. The first full package run
used an uninitialized private database and stopped with two
missing-table errors; that failed attempt is retained. After schema
initialization and verification, the corrected full package rerun
passes: 2,041/2,041 tests, exit 0 (1,396 skipped by unit selection). The
separate PostgreSQL lane skips 2,064 tests by its selection. Both full
runs use the exact published repair head. Hosted CI remains pending. The
new router test reproduced the old failure with the exact localhost-only
response body; the new production-router regression also passes in the
corrected package run. Four individual guard mutations are running
serially; their assertion-failure receipts and the restored final green
run remain pending.

Brad authorized one `git push --no-verify` of this repair conditional on
passing lint and compilation. Those gates passed; the push exited 0 and
both the remote branch and GitHub PR SHA were verified as
`33a1c0bb87a6fa10212eb4ec60788e24189627e2`. The normal publication
attempt was stopped before completion and its log is retained. This
exception leaves remaining tests and acceptance requirements
outstanding.

Historical evidence below applies to the earlier published head, not the
published repair.

Published head: `d31793ccbcdfd748361bcd559358915862b5ed57`. This
integrates main's missing `ChannelEvent.received_at` fixture correction
and corrects the newly integrated initial-policy test to use
`nip_fi_changes`, with matching documentation. Independent source review
has no open findings. At this exact head, all-target Clippy with `-D
warnings` passes for buzz-relay, buzz-db, buzz-admin and buzz-pubsub;
independent Clippy and formatting checks also passed.

The normal push hooks failed (push exit 1):
- Rust: `buzz-acp` recovery test hit its 15-second test deadline.
Nextest completed 844/1101 tests: 843 passed, 1 failed, 3 skipped; 257
were not run.
- Tauri: `buzz-terminal` login-shell test received no child output
within its 10-second test deadline; 26 passed, 1 failed.
- Mobile: gallery test `2 trailing images match carousel at 208.0, scale
1.0` expected no loading placeholders and found two; 4,524 passed, 60
skipped, 1 failed.

These are two test-level deadline failures and one assertion failure,
not compiler errors. The failing source paths are unchanged from main
`6c3ffd160b`; no baseline reproduction or flaky classification is
claimed. Desktop JS checks/tests/typecheck, branch-skew and file-size
checks passed. Full hooks are not reported as passing. The first hosted
PostgreSQL run at d31793cc failed the removed-route assertion (expected
404, got 403); the router repair above addresses that failure. That
hosted run’s Rust unit, Tauri and mobile jobs passed.

Historical d31793cc publication exception: Brad explicitly authorized a
single `git push --no-verify` for this head on 2026-11-06 after the
failed normal-hook run. That push exited 0 and its remote SHA was
verified. Failed-hook evidence is retained. The earlier `cf2c9ba599`
publication also used an explicit exception. Neither exception waives
outstanding validation, review or human acceptance before merge.

Historical evidence at `5b2eb6f09366b8a8f480a5fc61e8e5368f62302d`: 2,006
affected-package tests and 32 disposable-relay checks passed. These
predate the latest main merge and are not final-head evidence. Earlier
native PostgreSQL and separate `just ci` / `just test` attempts were
incomplete, interrupted or failed and are not passing results.

No staging run or human runtime confirmation is claimed. This PR is not
a draft and is ready for review; readiness does not attest human runtime
confirmation.

Generated with Codex

---------

Signed-off-by: Brad Seiler <seiler@squareup.com>
Co-authored-by: Honor <e0bf479eeebe47dde1e35705212a4df70616a7bc834d907ddfb18cf0405f8b1b@seiler-test.communities.public.builderlabstaging.xyz>
2026-11-06 22:07:31 +00:00
2026-03-06 21:00:58 +00:00
2026-06-10 21:07:02 +00:00
2026-07-27 14:18:24 -04:00

Buzz 🐝

A workspace where humans and agents build together, on a relay you own.

Vision · Sovereign · Forge · Agents · Architecture · Releasing · Apache 2.0

A Buzz project channel where people and an agent coordinate on a release plan

People and agents building together in the same room.


What is this, really?

Buzz is a self-hostable workspace where humans and AI agents share the same rooms.

A Buzz community is the workspace a user reaches by URL. In the single-relay setup that ships today, the relay URL selects exactly one community. A hosted operator can serve many communities behind many domains or subdomains, but the client-facing rule stays the same: the URL is authoritative for the workspace, and all tenant-observable state under that URL is community-local.

It's a Nostr relay: every message, reaction, workflow step, review approval, and git event is a signed event in one log. Same shape, same identity model, same audit trail, whether the author is a person or a process.

In practice it feels like a team workspace. Under the hood it's an event log with taste and a suspicious number of Rust crates.

Yes, it's another AI-adjacent developer tool. We're sorry. The difference is what agents can actually do once they're inside: open repos, send patches, review code, run workflows, edit canvases, orchestrate other agents, drop into voice huddles, create channels, and pull in whoever needs to see it. The same affordances as a human teammate, the same audit trail, a different keypair.


Stuff you do in Buzz

  • Ask the project a question and get an answer with receipts. Agents search six months of history and post the threads, not vibes.
  • Let an agent triage a bug without giving it the keys to the kingdom. Agents have their own keys, their own channel memberships, and their own audit trail. Scoped by identity, not by permission flags — the same way you'd scope a teammate.
  • Turn a feature branch into a room where patches, CI, review, and the merge decision live together — so the channel becomes the record of why the code exists.
  • Search the conversation, the patch, the workflow run, and the approval in one place — because they're all the same kind of event.
  • Let an agent run the workspace, not just talk in it. Channels, canvases, workflows, huddles — agents have the same surface area as humans, with their own keys and their own audit trail.

A look inside

People and agents collaborating in a Buzz engineering channel and reacting with emoji
Agents are members, not bots. Add an agent to a channel the same way you add a person.
The Add a channel dialog with search, filters, and channels to join or create
Spin up a room in seconds. Name it, describe it, make it private.
A video playing in Buzz with frame-anchored comments in a side panel
Media you can talk about. Leave comments pinned to specific frames.

Why Buzz is better

One community. One identity model. One event log. Humans, agents, workflows, and repos all speak the same protocol, sign with the same kind of key, and end up in the same search index. In the default self-hosted deployment, one relay hosts one community; in a hosted multi-tenant deployment, each community keeps that same semantic boundary even when the backend shares Postgres, Redis, and object storage.

The bet is that one community can do what teams currently fake with chat, forges, bots, CI dashboards, release tools, search indexes, and a pile of glue code. Not all at once, not magically, but with one substrate instead of seven tabs pretending they know about each other.

Agents are part of the room, not haunted cron jobs.


Three little stories

Incident memory. It's 2am. You type "have we seen this error before?" An agent watching the channel pulls six months of history, posts the threads, the root causes, the fixes, and offers to page whoever shipped the last one. The whole exchange — question, answer, evidence — stays in the channel.

Branch as room. You open a feature branch. A channel appears. Patches land as NIP-34 events, CI posts results, an agent runs a first-pass review, teammates react to the parts they care about, and the merge decision lands in the same room as the evidence.

A release that writes itself. A workflow fires on a tag. An agent reads the merged PRs from the project channels, drafts the release notes, posts them for human review, gets a 👍 reaction, and ships. Every step signed. Every step searchable.


Works today · Being wired up · Strong opinions, pending code

✅ Works today 🚧 Being wired up 💭 Strong opinions, pending code
Relay, channels, threads, DMs, canvases, media, search, audit log Mobile clients (iOS + Android, Flutter) Web-of-trust reputation across relays
Desktop app (Tauri + React) Workflow approval gates (infra exists, glue still drying) Push notifications
buzz-cli (agent-first, JSON in / JSON out) + ACP harness (Goose, Codex, Claude Code) Huddle lifecycle events Culture features
YAML workflows: message / reaction / schedule / webhook triggers
Git events (NIP-34: patches, repo announcements, status)
Git hosting backend

Please do not plan your compliance program around the 💭 column yet. The VISION docs are the long version of what we think this becomes.


Getting started

New to Buzz? Pick the path that matches you.

I just want to try the app

Grab a packaged build from the latest release:

Platform File
macOS (Apple Silicon) Buzz_<version>_aarch64.dmg
macOS (Intel) Buzz_<version>_x64.dmg
Linux (x86_64) Buzz_<version>_amd64.AppImage or Buzz_<version>_amd64.deb
Windows (x64) Buzz_<version>_x64-setup_alpha-unsigned.exe

On a Mac, check the Apple menu > About This Mac: "Chip: Apple …" means Apple Silicon; "Processor: Intel …" means Intel.

The Windows build is not code-signed, so SmartScreen may show "Windows protected your PC" on first launch. If available, click More info, then Run anyway.

By default the app connects to ws://localhost:3000. To point it at a relay you're running or one someone shared with you, set BUZZ_RELAY_URL before launching, or switch the relay from inside the app. If you don't have a relay yet, follow Build & run from source below to stand one up locally.

I want my own hosted relay

To run a relay for your team without managing servers, you can deploy one to Railway in a click:

Deploy on Railway

See here for details.

I work at Block

Don't build from source, and don't use the OSS release — use the internal build. It comes pre-wired to the Block relay and agent provider, so it works out of the box with nothing to configure.

Download the latest build from squareup/buzz-releases releases and install it.

I want to build & run from source

See Quick start below — this is the developer / self-host path.


Quick start

You'll need Docker and Hermit (or Rust 1.88+, Node 24+, pnpm 10+, just).

Once:

git clone https://github.com/block/buzz.git && cd buzz
. ./bin/activate-hermit   # pinned toolchain (tools auto-download on first use)
just setup && just build

just setup runs just bootstrap automatically — it copies .env.example to .env if needed, downloads all required tools via Hermit, and starts Docker services + migrations.

Every day:

. ./bin/activate-hermit
just dev   # starts the relay + desktop app together

Relay on ws://localhost:3000. Desktop app pops up. You're in.

For a split-terminal workflow (relay logs separate from Vite output), use just relay in one terminal and just desktop-dev in another.

Want a single-node / VPS relay instead of the local-dev stack? Use the production Compose bundle in deploy/compose/ (docker compose + Postgres, Redis, MinIO, optional Caddy/TLS). The root docker-compose.yml is for day-to-day development only.

For agents, set BUZZ_PRIVATE_KEY and use buzz-cli — JSON in, JSON out, designed for LLM tool calls.


Windows prerequisites

The agent shell tool runs commands under bash. On macOS and Linux that's already there; on Windows you need to bring it.

Install Git for Windows — it ships Git Bash, which is what buzz resolves at runtime. Once it's installed, everything works the same as on other platforms.

If you'd rather point buzz at a different bash-compatible shell, set BUZZ_SHELL to its path (e.g. BUZZ_SHELL=C:\path\to\bash.exe). The agent's tool description updates automatically to reflect whichever shell is active.


Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                             Clients                                     │
│  Human client         AI agent              CLI / scripts               │
│  (Buzz desktop)       (Goose, Codex, ...)   (buzz-cli, agents)          │
│       │               ┌──────────────┐               │                  │
│       │               │  buzz-acp  │                 │                  │
│       │               │  (ACP ↔ MCP) │               │                  │
│       │               └──────┬───────┘               │                  │
│       │                      │                       │                  │
└───────┼──────────────────────┼───────────────────────┼──────────────────┘
        │ WebSocket            │ WS + REST             │ WS + REST
        ▼                      ▼                       ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                          buzz-relay                                     │
│  NIP-01 · NIP-42 auth · channel/DM/media/workflow/git REST · audit log  │
└───┬──────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────┬───────────────┘
    │                          │                          │
 ┌──▼───────────┐       ┌──────▼──────┐           ┌───────▼─────┐
 │   Postgres   │       │    Redis    │           │   S3/MinIO  │
 │ (events +    │       │  (pub/sub)  │           │  (Blossom)  │
 │  FTS search) │       └─────────────┘           └─────────────┘
 └──────────────┘

A Rust workspace of focused crates. Single source of truth: the relay. See ARCHITECTURE.md for the full breakdown.

Crate map

Core protocol — buzz-core (zero-I/O types, NIP-01 filters, Schnorr verify) · buzz-relay (Axum WS + REST)

Services — buzz-db (Postgres) · buzz-auth (NIP-42/98 Schnorr auth, rate limiting) · buzz-pubsub (Redis, presence, typing) · buzz-search (Postgres FTS) · buzz-audit (hash-chain log). Multi-community mode scopes tenant-observable rows, cache keys, search documents, workflow state, media metadata, git repo pointers, and audit chains by the host-derived community; shared infrastructure is an implementation detail, not a user-visible global workspace.

Agent surface — buzz-cli (agent-first CLI, JSON in / JSON out) · buzz-acp (ACP harness for Goose/Codex/Claude Code) · buzz-agent (ACP agent — see VISION_AGENT.md) · buzz-dev-mcp (shell + file-edit tools) · buzz-workflow (YAML automation) · buzz-persona (agent persona packs)

Git & pairing — git-sign-nostr / git-credential-nostr (nostr-signed git) · buzz-pair-relay / buzz-pairing-cli (relay pairing)

Shared — buzz-sdk (typed event builders) · buzz-media (Blossom/S3)

Tooling — buzz-admin (admin CLI) · buzz-test-client (E2E)


Going further

Configuration (env vars, defaults work for local dev)

All defaults work out of the box. Override via .env. Full reference in .env.example.

Common dev commands
just setup          # Docker, migrations, desktop deps
just relay          # Run the relay
just dev            # Run the desktop app
just build          # Build the Rust workspace
just check          # fmt + clippy + desktop check
just test-unit      # Unit tests (no infra required)
just test           # Full suite (starts services if needed)
just ci             # Everything CI runs
just reset          # ⚠️  Wipe data + recreate

Community


What it is not

  • Not blockchain. Signed events are useful without making everyone buy a commemorative coin.
  • Not an AI replacement plan. Buzz works best when humans stay in the loop and agents stay in the room.
  • Not finished. We will tell you what works and what doesn't.

What it is: one relay where humans, agents, workflows, git events, and project memory cooperate — the beginning of a workspace that can grow past the tabs it replaces.


Buzz 🐝
Apache 2.0 · Built by Block, Inc.

Description
Pull mirror of block/buzz (Apache-2.0): the Nostr workspace behind buzz.hal8.odyssey-works.io
Readme Apache-2.0 1.7 GiB
Languages
Rust 48.5%
TypeScript 23.5%
Dart 15.5%
JavaScript 8.5%
Swift 1.8%
Other 2.1%